HybriDetect and Temperature Effects

03/20
2020

HybriDetect and Temperature Effects

Using higher Temperatures: Part of the NAFLIA Toolbox

Higher Temperatures: Stability aspects and assay Parameters

The general robustness is a characteristic feature of lateral flow devices (LFD’s). Even during longer transports and extreme weather conditions LFD’s remain stable. Temperature is an important factor when it comes to robustness. Therefore our HybriDetect test strips are regularly tested at higher temperatures.

Especially in the development of NALFIA’s (Nucleic Acid Lateral Flow Immunoassays), the temperature can influence the test result significantly. Higher temperatures can also be understood as tool in the assay procedure to achieve certain results. The hybridization of amplificates is classified as particularly interesting. The use of a defined temperature is a crucial parameter to maintain specific hybridizing conditions.

Higher Temperatures: Performance Test

For this reason, Milenia Biotec GmbH took a closer look at this issue: The universal test strips HybriDetect (MGHD1) and HybriDetect 2T (MGHD2 1) were examined under different conditions with dilution series of labelled dsDNA. The purified labelled amplificates were placed into running buffer and warmed to the desired temperature. Test strips were prewarmed as well for 30 minutes. After rewarming Lateral Flow Analysis was initiated. After five minutes signals were documented. The overall results are shown in the following figure.

Figure: Influence of higher temperatures to LFA-performance of HybriDetect test strips. Red triangles indicate temperature related nonspecific signals on test lines.

The results illustrate the robustness of the dipsticks. Even at 65 °C, a sensitive analysis is possible without a visible loss of performance. Nonspecific signal appear over 70°C, especially on the testline 2 of the HybriDetect 2T (red triangles in the figure). This effect is easy to explain. Like most LFD’s the HybriDetect platform includes antibodies. If these antibodies are exposed to temperatures over 70°C, denaturation takes place. This results in non-specific signals.

However, the full functionality of the HybridDetect test strips was demonstrated in the tested range of 20°C to 65 °C. Temperature should be considered as an additional tool in assay development. Try to profit from this feature!

Author
André Breitbach
abreitbach@milenia-biotec.de
+49 (641) 948883 – 0

Detecting Viruses – Major Pathogens in Aquaculture

08/12
2019

Detecting Viruses

Major Pathogens in Aquaculture

Several investigative techniques have been developed to detect viruses causing severe fish and shrimp diseases. The methods used are LAMP and RPA combined with our Lateral Flow Dipstick (LFD) for DNA Detection: HybriDetect. The addressed viruses cause diseases with a high mortality rate and therefore have a huge economic impact in fish farming industries (1-6).

Short Method Descriptions
LAMP – Loop-mediated isothermal amplification

LAMP is an isothermal DNA amplification method and thus can be done without using a thermocycler. LAMP based amplification procedures are usually done in the temperature range between 60°C and 60,001°C.

In general, two sets of primers (two outer and two inner primers) are used to identify six regions on the target gene (high specificity compared to PCR). LAMP uses Bst DNA polymerase large fragment, which has a high strand displacement activity. Compared to PCR, LAMP is very rapid (1 h).

RPA – Recombinase Polymerase Amplification

RPA is as specific as PCR amplification but much faster and can be done at temperatures between 37 and 42°C in just 10 minutes. RPA uses a recombinase, a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) and a polymerase. The recombinase pairs the primers to the homologue target DNA sequences. SSB stabilizes the resulting D-loop. DNA synthesis is initiated by the DNA polymerase.

LFD – Lateral Flow Dipstick – HybriDetect

The HybriDetect is a lateral flow dipstick (LFD), which is able to detect different molecules, such as gene amplification products, proteins and antibodies. A commonly used application for our test is to detect gene amplification products resulting from PCR, LAMP or RPA. Therefore, labeled primers must be used during the amplification step, so that the resulting DNA fragments are labeled and can be detected by the HybriDetect dipstick. Results can be reported within 5 minutes after lines become visible on the test Strip. HybriDetect is working with aqueous solution and does not contain toxic reagents such as EthBr.

Detecting Viruses – Applications
Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) detection
read full article

Ding et. al. developes a LAMP combined with the Milenia HybdriDetect 2T Lateral Flow Dipstick (LFD) for the detection of ISKNV (Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus), one of the most important pathogens in aquaculture, especially in China. The ISKNV causes high mortality in many freshwater and marine fish. The authors developed a test with a detection limit of 10 copies for the large cytoplasmic dsDNA virus. The method is rapid, sensitive, simple and has a high economic impact. The sensitivity was 1 000 fold higher than in comparable methods , like LAMP-AGE (4).

Cyprinid herpes virus 2 (CyHC-2) detection
read full article

CyHV-2 causes Herpesviral heamoatopoietic necrosis (HVHN) in carp aquaculture and is responsible for huge economic losses in China, USA and Australia. There is no effective prevention and the disease causes mortality up to 100 %. It is crucial, that HVHN is detected in a very early stage of the disease. Wang et al developed a RPA combined with our HybriDetect which can be done in just 15 minutes at 38 °C. The method is 100 times more sensitive than others and the authors couldn’t detect any cross reactions with other aquatic viruses (3).

Cybrinid herpes virus 3 (CyHC-3) and Koi Herpes Virus (KHV) detection
read full article

A LAMP-LFD (HybriDetect) method for the specific detection of cybrinid herpes virus 3 (CyHC-3) and Koi Herpes Virus (KHV) was invented by Soliman and El-Matbouli. This method can detect amounts of 10 fg DNA (30 copies vg) within one hour. It is much faster than the commonly used PCR (3 hours) and 10 to 100 fold more sensitive (5).

Detection and Differentiation of Carp oedema virus (CEV) and koi herpes virus (KHV)
read full article

With the current tests on the market, it is often difficult to determine between CEV and KHV, which both are common carp viruses. In 2017 a rapid and accurate tool was invented by Soliman and Matbouli to detect and differentiate CEV and KHV. The authors used RPA combined with HybriDetect (LFD) in their new assay which is very fast (60 min) compared to current methods (10 and 7 hours). The test can be used in field situation to reduce spread of the viruses (2).

Spring Viremia of Carp Virus (SVCV) Detection
read full article

SVCV is a cyprinid pathogenic virus, which usually needs to be detected in a lab. Most virus outbreaks can be seen in fishery banks. The invented detection method (LAMP with HybriDetect) is suitable for field-detection in aquaculture and can detect up to 860 fg DNA. The authors claim, that a rapid and accurate diagnosis of the virus is vital to prevent the spread of the virus and to minimize economic losses. Many commonly used techniques are time consuming or show cross reactions with other viruses; therefore a simple, but still accurate method like LAMP-LFD is needed (1).

Shrimp Taura Syndome Virus detection
read full article

Kiatpathomchai et al also used a combination of LAMP with LFD to detect the Shrimp RNA Virus Taura Syndrome Virus (TSV). This virus has a big economic impact regarding shrimp farming. The method developed by the authors is very quick (total assay about 70 min.). The sensitivity is comparable to other commonly used methods for RT-PCR detection of TSV (6).


Advantages

In summary the combination of LAMP or RPA combined with HybriDetect (LFD) Shows a number of advantages:

  • * Equivalent or even better sensitivity compared to commonly used PCR methods
    * Much faster
    * No cross reactions to other aquatic viruses
    * Field-application
    * Nearly no equipment/machines needed
    * Cost effective

 

Literature

  1. Comparison of Three Terminal Detection Methods Based on Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Spring Viremia of Carp Virus (SVCV). (2019). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 19(9), 805–816Soliman, H., & El-Matbouli, M. (2018)
  2. Rapid detection and differentiation of carp oedema virus and cyprinid herpes virus-3 in koi and common carp. Journal of Fish Diseases, 41(5), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12774
  3. Wang, H., Sun, M., Xu, D., Podok, P., Xie, J., Jiang, Y., & Lu, L. (2018). Rapid visual detection of cyprinid herpesvirus 2 by recombinase polymerase amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. Journal of Fish Diseases, 41(8), 1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12808
  4. Ding, W. C., Chen, J., Shi, Y. H., Lu, X. J., & Li, M. Y. (2010). Rapid and sensitive detection of infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. Archives of Virology, 155(3), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0593-4
  5. Soliman, H., & El-Matbouli, M. (2010). Loop mediated isothermal amplification combined with nucleic acid lateral flow strip for diagnosis of cyprinid herpes virus-3. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 24(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2009.09.002
  6. Kiatpathomchai, W., Jaroenram, W., Arunrut, N., Jitrapakdee, S., & Flegel, T. W. (2008). Shrimp Taura syndrome virus detection by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick. Journal of Virological Methods, 153(2), 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.06.025

Author
Dr. Jacqueline Hoffmann
QA — RA
jhoffmann@milenia-biotec.de
+49 (641) 948883 – 0

Hygiene monitoring in breweries

03/11
2019

Hygiene monitoring in breweries

Results in just 2 hours – Immediate corrective actions possible!

The quality of beer is controlled in breweries at each individual level of the production process. The presence of beer spoilage microorganisms is associated with an elevated risk to beer quality. Microbial contaminations create a negative impact on the taste, the texture and the smell of the final product. Contamination can occur over the entire production process, although the area of the filling machine is the main spot for contamination. For this reason, filling machines are cleaned intensively on a regular basis and the success of the cleaning process is controlled via close hygiene monitoring.

During this process, swabs are taken from different places on the illing machine, especially in the area of the fillers, and are transferred to a selective culture medium in order to monitor the potential bacterial growth. In the case of slow-growing or hard-to-cultivate bacteria being present in the swab, it can take days, up to

weeks, until a positive result from a culture can be reported. In this event, initiation of causal cleaning activities cannot be initiated.

For this reason, we are presenting a method that allows detection of beer spoilage bacteria directly from swabs within 2 hours! In this setting, the detection of obligate anaerobic bacteria of the genus Megasphaera and Pectinatus are of special interest. The basis of this method is the combination of a rapid extraction of the bacteria from the swabs, followed by PCR amplification. More information about the procedure is available here.

If you have questions related to the detection of beer spoilage microorganisms from swabs, or you would like to receive a demonstration in your brewery, please fill in the Contact Form and send it to us.

Author
Dr. Ralf Dostatni
Managing Director of Milenia Biotec GmbH
rdostatni@milenia-biotec.de
+49 (641) 948883 – 0